New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, in his most recent book
Thank You for Being Late, makes the case that we are living in a time of such exponential change that the pace of technological change has outpaced our personal and social institutions’ ability to keep pace.
Friedman argues that in order for communities, states, cities, and countries to thrive in this new world, they have to be innovative while at the same time be rooted in strong communities that can promote families, education and social cohesion. They have to be both dynamic and stable.
This combination of the dynamic and innovative with stable community is precisely what we do at Christchurch. Students need innovative approaches to education to prepare them for a world in which the amount of information is overwhelming and in which both college and jobs are rapidly changing. To grow and be ready to thrive in that uncertain world, young people need to be exposed to age-appropriate choice; they need authentic, “real world” challenges that have value beyond the classroom; they need skills or competencies like critical thinking, collaboration, communication, and perseverance that can be applied in new situations; they need relevant and meaningful learning that happens through making connections; and they need rigorous, disciplined inquiry. They need Liberal Arts for the 21stcentury.
But they need more than this; they need to do these things in a strong community based on relationships, values, trust, and high expectations.
In the words of Stanford University Education professor Denise Pope,
". . . students need to feel safe and cared for in school; they need to be healthy, both physically and mentally . . . they need supportive teachers, mentors, parents, and peers who will cheer them on and encourage them to take risks and help them learn from their mistakes; they need to see the value and relevance of what they are learning so that they are motivated and excited to work hard; and they need to learn the skills of communication, collaboration, adaptability, and critical thinking to be able to participate fully as active and ethical members of a global society."
Source: Pope, Brown, and Miles, Overloaded and Underprepared 2015.
This combination of innovative curriculum and strong, relationship-based community is at the heart of our programs. Each time we consider how to design or improve a program, we go back to our mission and identity statements:
Christchurch inspires and guides each student’s unique journey to self-confidence, purpose, and identity. Within a caring, structured community, students discover their infinite value and develop the skills to become compassionate, successful, and engaged global citizens.
At Christchurch School, we combine 100 years of tradition, community, and relationships with a dynamic and innovative approach to learning that meets each child where they are and prepares them to succeed in a rapidly changing world.
This is who we are and what we do. Fundamentally, we hope to create a culture of learning and growth in our students that will last them a lifetime. Learning and growing into your potential can't be accomplished just by rules or due dates or grades. They have to develop within a positive culture that meets students where they are and then helps them to grow beyond themselves to be people ready for the world.
We plan to make this a monthly feature from the Studies Office, each issue highlighting a program or practice that we are excited to share with you. In this inaugural piece, we want to talk about three, so please bear with us!
AN ENGAGED DAY = CHOICE AT NIGHT
One change we are thrilled to introduce this year is a recasting of our day and evening routine to help build student responsibility and reward constructive choices. For many years, students at Christchurch have led very full and active days with classes, co-curriculars, advisory, assembly, clubs, etc. Then in the evening, boarding and day students had the pile of homework to tackle, at the precise time of day when their energy and focus was at its lowest. While this is the normal formula for school, we began to consider how we could make this better, while helping to prepare our students for the choices that lay ahead of them in college.
With the launch of our integrated Humanities program this year (more about that in another edition!), we had the opportunity to rethink our requirements and how students spend their days. The result is that this year most students have a study period during the day, along with an hour-long skills period. Students who are productively engaged--in an advisor or teacher's room, in the library or other designated areas, working--during skills period and study periods (when they are less tired and more focused) and who use the evening reading period productively (40 minutes of unplugged reading time, with allowances for learning disabilities), and who are caught up on their work, earn some choice during the evening. They may study in their room or a classroom with a teacher, they may use the weight room, art room, or music room, or they may choose to rest). Students who do not use skills, study and reading time productively will be assigned to study halls. We believe this will be a winning combination of high expectations, structure, and choice to create a culture of growth and responsibility that will prepare them for college.
GRADES AS MARKERS, OR SOMETHING MORE?
Grades and grading are aspects of education that cause more stress for students, parents, and teachers than any other. Is it any wonder? From the lowest grades, we label students with grades, and we tell them that their future success--admission to college, success in life--depends upon those marks.
Yet we know in our hearts as teachers, as parents, and yes, as students, that grades, while necessary for college admission, never tell the whole story about a person.
Particularly difficult is the mathematical calculation of grades. Let's say a student begins the semester struggling in a class and earns low grades on initial assignments. Maybe a collection of Ds in the first quarter. Then that student works with their advisor and teacher, getting help (teachers are available every day during skills period!) and working hard on improving. Second quarter that student earns Bs and even the occasional A. By the end of the semester the student has made real progress in meeting the learning goals of the course and has really demonstrated that they have mastered the concepts the teacher wants them to master. What grade should that student receive for the semester? (The grade that goes on the transcript for college admission, rather than the quarter grade, which does not). A B, right? Unfortunately, in the traditional system, the answer is 'NO'. In the average calculation system, the student's first quarter is 40% of the semester grade, the second is 40% and the exam is 20%. Under this system, the best this student, who has made real progress in mastering the course, will receive is probably a C+, because their early work weighs 40%. This does not tell the whole story of the student nor does it help students use assignments and feedback as opportunities to learn and grow, since the immediate concern becomes the number. Grades should be a tool for honest feedback and growth. What they have become is an end in themselves.
There is a better way, a system called trend grading. In this approach, the student has the same assignments and is given the same feedback and grades from the teacher as they go along. The difference is that if a student improves, the teacher is not locked into following a strictly mathematical formula for assigning a grade, but rather will use a schoolwide rubric to reflect the progress a student has actually made. The idea is that the final grade a student receives at the end of the semester reflects the student’s whole story, of how they have progressed and of what they have mastered. Grades given before that are feedback to help students grow, rather than "marks" that define the limits of their potential progress. This will allow teachers to give genuine feedback, in the knowledge that students can use that feedback to grow and improve without fear of one grade determining their future.
This year we are very excited to introduce trend grading as an optionfor students at Christchurch. We know this will feel unfamiliar at first, and so teachers will be offering trend grading to students in each class as a choice. Students may stick with the traditional system entirely, and they may choose average calculation for one class, and trend grading in another. We believe this will be a huge improvement in making the student experience more about learning and growing and less about being marked. It's a big step forward! Students will have the opportunity to discuss the options with their teachers and advisors before deciding what is best for them after the third week of school. Parents, if you would like to weigh in on that choice, please feel free let your child’s the advisor know. If you have questions about this option, please contact Donny Pyles or Neal Keesee.
TRANSFER GRADES AND TRANSCRIPTS
The last change we want to introduce in this edition concerns transcripts. To bring us more in line with industry standards, this year we are making a change to how we handle transfer courses on our transcripts. As of the 2019-2020 school year, we will no longer be listing courses taken at other institutions on our transcripts, nor will we be trying to translate grading scales and course weighting from other schools into our system. Instead, we will include a digital copy of transcripts from other institutions as part of the senior year college application. This will allow courses and grading systems employed by other schools to stand on their own. The grade point average for students will be calculated using courses taken at Christchurch only. Colleges and universities we have consulted welcome this change, as it provides them a clearer view of what a student has taken, and most colleges perform their own GPA calculations drawing on all available transcripts.
For students already enrolled at Christchurch there will be no change in their transcripts, unless you would like transfer courses removed from their Christchurch transcript, which we are happy to do. To request this please contact the Studies Office. Please note that this change means that families must provide us with official transcripts from all former schools so that we may be sure to include them in the digital application.
CLOSING THOUGHTS
Because the end point for our students is usually college, the stakes in their educational experience always feel very high and we know that change may feel disconcerting. Because our practice is based both in research and in what we know as educators to be good for young people, we are very confident that these changes are positive ones. We are in regular contact with colleges both directly and via conferences. We know that none of these changes will have anything but a favorable impact on college admission. In fact, colleges are also swept up in the tide of our changing world and are looking for students who have exactly the characteristics we are cultivating are Christchurch.
We look forward to continuing this conversation in our next edition. If you have questions or would like to learn more, please feel free to contact Donny Pyles or Neal Keesee in the Studies Office. We also encourage you to explore these and many other ideas in the evolving world of education through such organizations as Challenge Success (challengesuccess.org) and the Mastery Transcript Consortium (mastery.org). One great place to start is the book our faculty read this summer: Overloaded and Underprepared: Strategies for Stronger Schools and Heathy, Successful Kids by Pope, Brown, and Miles.